Opinions on Ministerial Notifications


Ministerial decisions not to provide information to Parliament


This report deals with a decision by the Minister for Tourism, the Hon Paul Papalia MLA, not to provide a research report to Parliament by BDA Marketing Planning (BDA) titled High Value Traveller Research, October 2018.

It also deals with a section 82 notice from the Minister for Regional Development, the Hon Alannah MacTiernan MLC, where an opinion was not required about the scope of works and business cases for each project funded from the remote swimming pool program.

Section 82 of the Financial Management Act 2006 (the FM Act) requires a Minister who decides that it is reasonable and appropriate not to provide certain information to Parliament, to give written notice of the decision to both Houses of Parliament and the Auditor General within 14 days of the decision.

Section 24 of the Auditor General Act 2006 (AG Act) requires the Auditor General to provide an opinion to Parliament as to whether the Minister’s decision was reasonable and appropriate.

What we did

The Audit Practice Statement on our website ( sets out the process we follow to arrive at our section 82 opinions, including:

  • a review of entity documents
  • a review of any advice provided to the relevant Minister by entities, the State Solicitor’s Office (SSO) or other legal advisers
  • interviews with key entity persons including discussions about our draft findings and the Auditor General’s opinion.

Our procedures are designed to provide sufficient appropriate evidence to support an independent view to Parliament on the reasonableness and appropriateness of the Minister’s decision.

We have not performed an audit, however our procedures follow the key principles in the Australian Auditing and Assurance Standards.



Back to Top