Local Government Procurement

Audit conclusion

All 8 local governments we reviewed had shortcomings in their procurement practices, most related to weak procurement controls, processes and documentation for tendering, purchase orders and approvals, and reviewing invoices and payment. However, we did not identify any evidence of misconduct.

Local governments varied in how well they complied with legislation and their own procurement policies. While local government’s policies broadly met regulatory requirements, they need to do more to monitor procurement controls and the effectiveness of processes. We saw no notable difference in the effectiveness of controls between the regional and metropolitan, and the small and large local governments we examined.

Having policies and controls that are appropriate, and monitoring their effectiveness is essential if local governments, and the ratepayers that they serve, are to have confidence in local government procurement activities. Procurement practices that focus solely on minimum compliance with legislation are unlikely to provide local governments with the oversight and control they need to address risks and ensure value for money in their procurement.

The issues identified in this audit are relatively simple to fix. By addressing them, governance of this important local government function can be strengthened.

Page last updated: October 11, 2018

Back to Top