Local Government Building Approvals

Audit finding – LG entities do not effectively monitor and enforce compliance with building permits

The LG entities carried out limited monitoring, inspections and enforcement to ensure building works complied with permits. They identified most compliance matters through complaints but did not always take timely action to resolve them. The lack of monitoring and appropriate enforcement meant LG entities could not identify and address non-compliant building works or resolve community concerns in an effective and timely way.

Builders must also ensure their work complies with the permit and the Code, and submit a completion certificate to the LG entity within 7 days of finishing building works. Builders are legally responsible for faulty and defective work for up to 6 years after completion.

LG entities carry out limited monitoring and inspections of building work

None of the 4 LG entities had a formal policy or program to monitor and inspect building works, nor did they conduct monitoring or inspections at all key stages of building works. However, we found Albany monitored permit expiry, Gosnells inspected footings, and Joondalup and Mandurah did one-off projects on a small sample of building works (Figure 5). The Act gives LG entities power to monitor and inspect building works to ensure compliance with permits. However, the Act does not require LG entities to inspect building works at key stages of construction.

The LG entities had not assessed the effectiveness of their existing compliance activities to understand whether they should continue their current work, or allocate resources to other quality and safety risks arising from non-compliance. LG entities advised that resource constraints and their inability to recover costs from current application fees limited the extent of their compliance work. A risk-based monitoring program could help LG entities use their limited resources to target the most serious and likely risks, and thereby provide better assurance that houses are well built and safe to live in.

Each year B&E inspects a small number of building works at key stages of construction. In the last 2 financial years, B&E inspected 337 new houses (1.2% out of nearly 28,500 approvals) and found nearly 30% to 50% of key stages did not satisfactorily comply with the Code or permit. For example, slab, roof and bushfire readiness issues were areas of identified shortcoming. These findings highlight the need for monitoring and inspections of building work to enhance compliance and provide safeguards to the community so that new houses meet quality and safety standards.

During our audit, B&E told us that it is preparing a consultation paper, which considers independent inspections. This will include options on who could do inspections, at what stages of construction, and the fees or costs. Other states, except for South Australia, require independent inspections at 4 to 6 key stages and most use private building surveyors to carry out these inspections. South Australian building law requires LG entities to inspect a certain percentage of building works every year.

LG entities could improve complaints processes to achieve more timely compliance

While all LG entities properly investigated complaints, they did not always take timely action to resolve community concerns about building works. In our review of 43 complaints about matters including building without a permit, deviation from the approved plans, and dangerous state of a building or structure, we found:

  • 6 compliance matters across Albany, Joondalup and Mandurah took between 8 months and 7 years to be resolved. These LG entities often allowed builders and owners extensions to the required compliance time. Albany had 1 matter which commenced in 2011 and was resolved in 2018
  • 10 complainants were not advised of the outcome. This sometimes led to follow up complaints for matters that were already being dealt with. Not advising complainants of the outcome is likely to result in a perception of unsatisfactory customer service and ineffective regulation.

Timely and appropriate enforcement action by LG entities deters non-compliance and sends a strong message to builders and owners who do not comply with permits. In the last 2 financial years Gosnells, Joondalup and Mandurah issued 24 building orders, of which 20 were issued by Gosnells. In the same period, the 3 LG entities prosecuted 8 matters. Penalties totalled $122,000. However, Albany has not issued a building order or prosecuted a matter since the Act was introduced.

LG entities advised that they preferred an informal approach (education and warning letters) to maintain a softer image in the community. They also told us that a lack of resources, staff time and other costs limit their ability to take formal enforcement actions (building orders and prosecution).


Back to Top